Skip to main content

The employment gap

Here's a link:

http://www.autism.org.uk/get-involved/media-centre/news/2016-10-27-employment-gap.aspx

Think a moment about the stat. 16% of autistic adults in full-time work. Sixteen percent. That is desperate and shameful - and it doesn't even consider how many of those lucky sixteen percent are able to fulfil their potential and develop their career. Another link:

https://www.wearethecity.com/nine-ten-uk-companies-not-considering-neurodiverse-candidates/


If only 10% of workplaces make accommodation for neurodiversity, that inarguably presents an obstacle to autistic and other neurodiverse people, it will contribute to the employment gap, and any proposals to address the problem should be both welcomed and encouraged

However, it only gets us so far. Before adjustments can be made to help an autistic person in the workplace, they have to be in the workplace. Granted, very few people enjoy interviews and assessment centres, whether neurotypical or not - but for autistic candidates, it's another matter entirely: put simply, it would be difficult to create a process which more severely limits an autistic candidate's chances than the standard interview system.


Unfamiliar surroundings. Unfamiliar people. Vague, open-ended questions. Being judged on your ability to talk about yourself - even to lie about yourself - with confidence and in terms that others will understand. The expectation of eye contact and correct body language. Selling yourself. These are extremely challenging concepts for autistic people. And in all likelihood, it has absolutely nothing to do with the individual's capacity to do the job and to contribute to the organisation. I'd even go so far as to call it discriminatory: an obstacle is created, however benign the intentions may be, that actively makes it less likely that an autistic person will be hired.

Autistic people have so much to offer in the workplace. Not only are we able to develop a wide range of skills just like anyone else, but our distinct patterns of thinking actually make us better at some jobs. Why would any business not want that? Why would any business choose to dissuade a candidate who can make a real contribution in the role?

I don't really believe that many employers are deliberately shunning autistic people. Rather, it's a failure to understand, and an unwillingness to challenge an established method. That awful figure, 84% unemployed or underemployed, will not improve unless autistic people have access to opportunities without being excluded by a narrow hiring process. Key to this is judging an individual by their abilities: give the candidate a chance to show what they can do with a piece of work, in an environment that they find reasonably comfortable; if appropriate, invite candidates to produce a portfolio showing what they've done in the past (but be clear about exactly what should be in the portfolio); take the time to speak to referees, rather than sending out a generic form; do not judge - and please make clear that you're not judging - the candidate for a lack of eye contact or fidgety behaviours; and ensure that any questions are concise and specific.


And finally, just be nice. Autistic people don't need to be wrapped in cotton wool (this is something I'll address in a future post), and we won't be a burden, but we live in a world which is rarely supportive or considerate of our needs. A bit of friendly reassurance never goes amiss.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

I've not been able to write much lately

Hello. I know I've not added anything to this blog in a while. It's not been by choice. My brain has, for want of a better term, collapsed. The best I can do is to get out of bed at some point during the day, to eat, to breathe, to hydrate. Work - and some other daily life stresses, including my parents' health, but primarily work - has completely overwhelmed me. I can't do it any more; for one thing, there's been far too much of it, I've been covering three jobs for six months now, but there's also the strain of being in a work environment, the sensory overload, the masking, the unpredictability. What has been exhausting before has now become highly debilitating. My life has just... well, it's broken. I can't do anything. That, in itself, is saddening (I love to walk and to cook, and these have been taken from me of late), and being all sad and woe-is-me about that just serves to pile on to the underlying problem. Underlying problem being: autist...

I get pissed off by a tweet

This is by no means the worst thing I've read about autism: Nevertheless, it struck a nerve, and pushed me over the line from 'maybe I should write a blog' to 'yep, definitely need to start writing a blog'. Over the past year, I've found myself increasingly assertive in opposing misconceptions and lies about autism wherever I find them. At the heart of these, so often, is the idea of autism as a disease - one you can catch, one you can perhaps cure. When this rears its head, you'll often find scientifically-literate folk fighting back - and I'm glad they do, it's important work. However, there's a personal perspective that I always want to add, something very simple yet so often overlooked: I am not a disease. Look at that tweet. It's not shouty and crazy, it's not full of woo. In a very level and apparently considered (if scientifically nonsensical) manner, it presents autism as a dreadful condition that one can catch from a p...

I decide to write a blog

Before we began with the questions, and there were a lot of questions, I was told how it would work: the questions, then I'd go out into the waiting room for a while whilst they discuss my assessment, reach some conclusions, and if there was any uncertainty, I'd be asked to come back for further questions, further assessment. Certainly, the impression seemed to be, that second stage of assessment was more likely than not. Then the questions came, and I answered best I could, and as planned, I was asked to wait outside. No sooner had I sat down than they called me back; diagnosis of autism, no further assessment required, not borderline, clear as day, autistic. Lurch back eight months: a helpful therapist called Liz, a curious rounded room in the turret of an odd-looking building, asking me if it had ever been suggested I might be autistic (no, never). I did some informal tests, was put on a waiting list, eventually got that assessment. But Liz told me something else, she to...